MAN OF STEEL NEEDS AN ENEMA

Because MAN OF STEEL is kind of shitty.

I am going to do something different this time and talk about things I liked as well as the perpetual shit parade that pranced throughout my viewing of this movie.

I was okay with Superman killing Zod. I was okay with the destruction of Metropolis. At that point in the film Zod was–while wanting to pummel Kal-El into oblivion–still more interested in the annihilation of humanity. Had they pulled a SUPERMAN II move I am confident that this Zod would have simply erased Metropolis from the face of the planet, rather than flying after Superman to some remote location.

THINGS I LIKED:

  • Faora. She will be mine. Oh yes, she will be mine. I was also a big fan of how she fights. What, you thought I was just thinking with my penis here? Using super speed to traverse the extremely short distances between her and her enemies was fun to watch and a good use of her new-found powers.

  • Kevin Costner. He probably had the best performance out of anyone in the film.
  • Costume and set design, especially on Krypton. I even warmed up to Superman’s new suit.
  • When Thick Morpheus grabbed his compadres during the destruction of Metropolis and, instead of continuing to run along the path of a falling skyscraper a la PROMETHEUS, he ducked down the nearest side street.
  • Superman finding his inner …Superman and, despite the fifty-five billion tons of Kryptonian gravity bearing down on him, finds his can of spinach and manages to fly up and curb stomp the world machine.
  • Lois Lane making fun of Superman and informing him that it is, in fact, an S on his chest.

THINGS I DIDN’T LIKE:

  • You’re going to change the world x65. I didn’t actually count to see how many times Clark was told that he would change the world, but basing it on how annoyed I became with the line I am estimating it being uttered no less than sixty-five times.

  • Shaky cam. I hate American film makers with such unbridled fury that my rage could burn up the sun and blacken our solar system permanently. For once I would like to watch a new triple A movie that wasn’t filmed with a fucking GoPro or Handycam. I would also like to see a movie that doesn’t have scene cuts every four to six seconds, especially during climactic fight sequences. Anyone watch BULLET TO THE HEAD? I recommend students of film seeing it at least once so they can log it away as how fight scenes should never be done.
  • Lens flares. I know everyone in Hollywood seems to be infatuated with burning the collective retina of their audience with shiny bullshit. It ruins immersion. I’m supposed to BE THERE, right? Especially with all that camera being three inches from the faces of the actors, held by a man with late-stage Parkinson’s disease crap. I thought the point of shaky cam and “Is that a hair coming out of his nose?” cinematography was to help the audience feel immersed in the flick, then they go and ruin it by adding lens flare effects. If I were actually there, on Krypton, I WOULDN’T SEE LENS FLARES, JACKASSES! Jor-El doesn’t see lens flares, why should I be subjected to their headache inducing effects? You have multi-million dollar equipment and tens of thousands of dollars worth of education, some of which to teach you how to avoid real lens flares and other camera anomalies, and then you ask the guys in the visual effects department to add a metric ton of them back in? Fuck you.
  • Zod. I was in no way, shape or form, ever intimidated by this man. In fact, it seemed to me that he was doing far less acting and far more reading all of his lines from a cue card, and reading them poorly. I’m not saying we needed a different actor–although that may have helped–I’m just saying that maybe once or twice during production Zack Snyder could have taken him aside and, you know, politely asked him to do his job. The Zod from Superman II was way more scary than this guy, and he was practically a string bean!
  • Krypton’s “atmosphere” rendering Superman helpless. I almost wanted this to make sense, but then I realized that Zod and his henchmen were capable of super strength while still breathing in Krypton’s atmosphere by way of their respirators. Why are they still super strong but it strips Kal-El of his powers? I attempted to argue with myself that they’re so used to Krypton’s gravity that they merely appear to be super strong while on Earth. But that’s crap, because if their ship really simulated Krypton’s gravity how come Lois Lane’s frail, human body wasn’t instantaneously crushed when she boarded? You know, like how all the cars and buildings were reduced to two dimensions during the brief terraforming of the planet to mimic Kryptonian conditions. Woops?
  • Along the same lines, I wasn’t really cool with how it took Clark Kent 33 years to acquire, hone, and control his powers but it required Zod and his goons roughly forty-five seconds to do the same. Especially when the movie attempts to explain that over the course of those 33 years Superman has absorbed so much of the sun’s radiation that it has made him immensely strong. But somehow Zod’s cells can replicate that process in just a handful of minutes. Wut?
  • Finally… Flying in the infinite vaccuum of space where there exists no air or atmosphere: NO PROBLEM! Breathing “Kryptonian atmosphere” for fifteen seconds: OMG, WHERE ALL MY POWERS GO? Anyone else facepalming out there?

So really, to sum everything up, the entire problem with MAN OF STEEL wasn’t that Zack Snyder reinvented the character, loosely based on the previous seventy-five years of canon. The problem is that he wanted to turn Superman into a science fiction movie but neither he nor his writers were intelligent enough to make it happen. Which is, honestly, a major failing of just about all science fiction movies. So thank you, Mr. Snyder, for shitting all over nearly a century of canon in favor of creating something that managed to make even less sense than a man who uses a pair of eyeglasses as the primary element to his alter ego disguise.

Guns – Violence – Fuck Jim Carrey

Well, maybe not fuck Jim. In case you haven’t heard, Mr. Carrey recently released a video parody of Hee Haw, poking fun at insecure, overcompensating dickwads who use firearms to prop up their failing masculinity. I realize his video wasn’t targeting people like me. It was targeting people like Alex Jones; crazy, uneducated motherfuckers, who love spreading hate. Of course you have the flip side of that insanity sandwich with people like Piers Morgan; someone who is equally crazy, equally uneducated, and equally a motherfucker.

I grew up around firearms. Guns are not evil to me. I was taught how to use them. I was taught how to care for them. But most importantly, I was taught how to respect them. And therein lies most of the problem when it comes to guns: people do not respect what they are capable of. A bandsaw does not go around cutting people’s fingers off, but every year in woodshop classes around the world students are losing digits because they failed to respect the equipment. Unloaded guns are responsible for more accidental deaths than loaded guns.

Wait, that doesn’t make any sense, right? It makes perfect sense. When someone perceives a gun to be unloaded, any respect they had for the firearm is thrown out the window. So you end up with idiots shooting their friends, themselves, their family, because they thought the gun was unloaded. When I was growing up, I was taught to treat a gun with respect regardless of whether it was or was not loaded. You pay attention to the business end and you make sure it is always pointing in a safe direction. Period.

We are a violent species. We have been glorifying violence for thousands of years. We always have been and always will be driven by violence. That’s not to say that we can’t do something about reducing it. Taking guns out of the equation doesn’t actually solve anything, because the underlying violence still remains. Yes, guns can dramatically alter the outcome of that violence, but without them violence is still prevalent. People are still getting mugged, people are still being threatened, the only difference is they’re being sent to the hospital with knife wounds and broken bones instead of gunshot wounds–you haven’t solved anything.

Improving our education is one step of many that may help to curb violence. Why are we spending so much time and money trying to demonize guns when we could be using it to improve Little Johnny’s education, to improve his home environment, to help educate his parents? Universal healthcare would certainly help poorer families care for their children and themselves, allowing them to take the money they would have used on that to instead provide a more stable environment for their offspring. Not everyone who is poor wants to be poor. Not everyone who is poor spends their paycheck on beer and cigarettes. Just like not everyone who owns a firearm is as much of a dipshit as Wayne LaPierre.

The final piece of advice I would like to offer to America is this: learn how to love and forget how to hate. Stop watching Fox news. Stop watching MSNBC. Stop reading Infowars. Stop reading Huffington Post. Pull your head out of your ass and begin thinking for yourself. Learn to have a meaningful discussion with someone of opposing views without yelling at them, and maybe you’ll learn from one another. Pull your head out of your ass. Pull your head out of your ass. Pull your head out of your ass.

Looper – Review

I spent the first 5 minutes of Looper wondering if Joseph Gordon-Levitt had a brother. Why? For this movie, they altered him with makeup (three hours’ worth, I hear) to make him look more like Bruce Willis, as he plays his younger version. And what a fantastic job they did. I actually had to imdb the movie after it started to make sure it was him. I spent time trying to find flaws with it and found none. He is painstakingly made to look like he is not wearing makeup. He also worked hard to reflect some of Bruce’s mannerisms and facial expressions – very believable. So kudos to the makeup and prosthetics team – you knocked it out of the park and I want to see more makeup jobs like this. And kudos to Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

Now, the movie.

It’s great! The action scenes are well-made and there is some humor laced into the script, which I love. The plot and premise of the movie is original and entertaining. It’s definitely worth a rewatch or two to find symbolism in the various scenes. The sci-fi aspects of the movie were well thought out and significantly less boring than the recent trash that has come out and pretended to be good sci-fi. (Total Recall and Prometheus, to name a few) I don’t really have complaints about any of the actors or really anything. It was just plain good. I’d advise at least renting it.

There are some potential flaws to the time travel aspects of the movie if you think about them too much. However, time travel is theoretical, so the director decided on his own way of doing things, which I respected and enjoyed. He also put a scene in the middle that I think speaks directly to the viewer, where Bruce Willis tells his past self to stop worrying and thinking so much about the future and live in the moment. If you as an audience member live in the moment, you will thoroughly enjoy yourself. ;)

Hope Springs for Abraham Lincoln’s Men in Black.

Men in Black III was good. Much better than the second movie but perhaps not quite as good as the first. Josh Brolin should win an Oscar for his performance as young K – his mannerisms, facial expressions, everything is just spot on. I’d say it’s worth it to rent this purely to watch him act the part.

I also loved the villain. He is quite disturbing and somehow oddly charming..and the visual design and costume for him is fantastic. Jemaine Clement was perfectly cast for the role. Emma Thompson was great as O and I would like to see more of her in the future – she was a nice balance for J and K’s banter. I don’t really have any complaints about the movie as a whole. It’s not life-changing or groundbreaking, but it’s an excellent part to the series, in fact, I think the second one should be abolished (SO BAD) and this should replace it. The humor is fun and the jokes weren’t overdone. Definitely rent!

——————-

Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter impressed me. I was expecting a very corny hack-and-slash Resident Evil type flick. Definitely not the direction they took it in. It’s serious, yes, which I have read many reviewers complain about – but it’s not so serious that it undermines how awesomely silly the premise of the movie is. They maintain a solid pace and storyline, which made it more entertaining, at least for me. Maybe it’s because I’m Canadian. Who knows. Altering important political history to include the supernatural…epic.

In any case, I found the fight scenes extremely fun yet dramatic, colorful, and well-thought-out..very Matrixy. They provide an excellent counterbalance to the serious political tone. And they’re ORIGINAL – when’s the last time you saw two men fighting while jumping through and over a stampeding herd of horses? Never. Elegance and an almost comic-book exaggeration combined to make this so cool. The acting was pretty good. I’m still not sure I’m 100% sold on Benjamin Walker as Abe, but besides that I don’t recall anyone bothering me. Sturgess is a quick and easy favorite, very likeable, and I would have liked to see more of him.

If you’re a serious patriot who is very gung-ho about politics and/or America, you probably won’t like this movie. You probably also won’t be reading this review because you’re busy getting your guns ready to prepare yourself for government invasion, so I most likely don’t need to worry. ;)

I would definitely advise Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter for a rental, especially if you like old-style movies or are in an action kind of mood. You can’t really go wrong. The movie has a nice wave pattern in terms of action versus story, so don’t expect constant mind-shattering explosions, but I’d be surprised if you didn’t enjoy at least some of the ride.

——————–

Hope Springs is arguably one of the best serious movies I’ve seen in a while. Yes, it’s sad..and romantic. I’ve read lots of complaints from men on Rotten Tomatoes who thought it was a “total chick flick” and that they should have “left it for the wife to watch”…but really, as long as you don’t have an ego the size of the Death Star and you can admit that as a man, you have emotions too, you might enjoy it. ;) People who complain that romance between elderly people is creepy, seriously, you need to grow the fuck up – you’re going to be old some day too. And yes, you’ll have sex. And no, you won’t look sleek and well-muscled anymore. Surprise!!

The acting, as expected, is phenomenal. Meryl Streep is never bad. Tommy Lee Jones..also never bad. And Steve Carell, while in a serious movie, still manages to make us giggle even though most of his lines are actually quite serious. I thought it was an excellent transition for him from comedic to serious, especially in comparison to some of the crap Paul Rudd or Adam Sandler have done when trying to jump from one to the other. He actually makes it work here.

A major flaw of many romantic dramas is that the conflict is often forced. I.e, the woman THINKS the man is doing something and rather than talking about it for 30 seconds and finding out it’s untrue, she immediately has a conniption fit and leaves the country. No forced conflict here. I thought the movie had a very real flow with very real things happening. I felt like just slapping both of them in the face occasionally and saying “GUYS!!! WHY DID YOU LET IT GET LIKE THIS!!”, but I think that’s the point…to jerk you around emotionally and make you feel for their situation, whether you can relate to it or not.

Rent this but be prepared for sad. It’s not a comedy – don’t get it if you think you will spend your time laughing. Just like love, it’s a bit of a struggle with ups and downs, but in the end – well, you’ll have to see. ;)

Totally Recalling the neighborhood Watch for Resident Evil

The Watch:

I went into this expecting a pretty terrible movie. I wasn’t sure how (based on the previews) Ben Stiller and his backup cast of rude comedians were going to last for an hour and a half walking around the neighborhood being clumsy and stupid. But the movie took a turn for the better relatively quickly. It’s not what you thought it was about, trust me. I will keep it a secret even throughout this review and only say that I was pleasantly surprised with the plot. It’s a much more entertaining experience if you don’t look up what the movie is actually about.

Yes, it was still stupid, riddled with Vince Vaughn’s usual machine gun wit and Jonah Hill’s rude and lewd shtick. Richard Ayoade was a pleasant counterbalance with his British accent and uberpolite delivery of vulgar lines. I am looking forward to seeing the next movie he does; he was quite enjoyable.

I think the main complaint I have is the attempt to lace the movie with a serious subplot about Ben Stiller’s character being sterile. It’s just..strange and seems not to fit. They’re spending a lot of time talking about dicks and balls, as expected, and the serious edge was odd to me.

Overall, at least worth renting for kicks.

Resident Evil: Retribution:

This is on about the same level as the other Resident Evil movies. Silly one-liners, lots of zombies and assorted mutations, and evil corporation blablabla. If you were entertained by the others, you’ll like this one fine. I enjoyed the addition of Leon, the main character in the video game franchise, and Ada Wong. The costumes were awesome and the large zombie creature they used was well-animated and pretty freakish. I also loved the SOUNDS they used for the guns – I’m not sure what they did, but it felt so satisfying whenever she shot a zombie. I think they used a more video game-type effect for these and I think that was an excellent move. Unrealistic, maybe..but better. Why resort to realism when people are flying around the air like Olympic gymnasts killing the crap out of some zombies? Exactly.

Overall…the usual.

Total Recall:

This COULD have been an amazing remake. Could have, but didn’t quite stand up.

The action scenes were great. The combat between Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel was fabulous and sexy, and Kate Beckinsale does a fantastic job as a villain. I loved the effects and how things were visually. There were some gravity reversal combat scenes that absolutely destroyed. So far so good.

But WHY did they make so many changes to the plot? Okay, it takes place on Earth instead of Mars. I can wrap my head around that. Fine. But I don’t think they THOUGHT about it other than making a cool tunnel allowing people to travel through the core of the Earth to the other side. Very cool. Further than that? Brian Cranston is always great but his character has flimsy motives. For some reason, he wants to kill all of the citizens in the ghettos of the city and replace them with robots….making sense yet? It never does. He also seems to show up everywhere instead of sending cronies. This guy is the freaking big bad guy in charge..and he shows up for invasions with his robots!

Also disappointing was the transformation of the movie from science fiction to post apocalyptic, sort-of not-really science fiction. They completely removed mutants and the concept thereof, which kills of a large part of the plot, including the removal of Matthias himself housing a little alien being on his chest. No more aliens, no more mutants. Matthias is on screen for what may be a total of 3 minutes and then dies. Did I care when he did? No…his death brought zero consequence to the movie’s plot, unlike in the first Total Recall. He died and I forgot he died 5 minutes later as I watched the main characters jump around on weird 3D elevators. Cool, but the plot keeps falling into these weird holes that wouldn’t have been there if they hadn’t tried to so drastically change it from the first movie. Oh, and they left the three-breasted woman as a type of homage. BUT THE HOMAGE MAKES NO SENSE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MUTANTS IN THIS VERSION. So how does she have three breasts? Did she just get a third one put there? What the hell.

Colin Farrell does an alright job. It’s not quite as fantastic as when you see Arnold running around like a bull in a china shop killing people and freaking out, though. I don’t know that anyone could match that.

Overall, as a standalone movie, passable. As a remake, meh. I wasn’t as impressed as I should have been. Disappointed.